[News] Injunction granted to block Alberta's anti-trans bill

[yuuago]

LGBT organizations Egale Canada and Skipping Stone have won an injunction against Bill 26, a law meant to ban gender-affirming care for youth in Alberta. [CBC, Egale Canada]

They initiated litigation against the government of Alberta in March. More info here.

This is a temporary stop, and unfortunately the injunction only covers the trans healthcare issue, not all the other trans-relevant issues the UCP has been trying to push through. However, it buys us some time, and that's very important.

I expect we'll be talking about this at the next local pride meeting, trying to see if there's any clear next steps for what we can do (or what Wood Buffalo Pride can do, rather).

Happy pride month.


Alberta judge grants temporary injunction blocking a transgender health-care bill via CBC

2SLGBTQ+ advocacy groups launched challenge of law, passed late last year but not fully in effect

An Alberta judge has put on hold a provincial law that bans doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth.

Justice Allison Kuntz, in a written judgment Friday, said the law raises serious issues that need to be hashed out in court, and issued a temporary injunction against the law before it fully came into effect.

Kuntz wrote that a temporary stop is needed to prevent what she calls "irreparable harm" coming to young patients while the issue is debated.

"The evidence shows that singling out health care for gender diverse youth and making it subject to government control will cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth by reinforcing the discrimination and prejudice that they are already subjected to," Kuntz wrote in the judgment.

The law, passed late last year but not fully in effect, would have prevented doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16.

Kuntz wrote that denying access to this care not only risks causing youth emotional harm but also exposes them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity.

"Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth," she wrote.

"Gender diverse youth will bear the entire burden of that speculation."

2SLGBTQ+ advocacy groups Egale Canada and the Skipping Stone Foundation took the case to court, and in a statement Egale said the decision was a "historic win."

Also listed as applicants in the case are five transgender youth who will be directly affected.

Egale's legal director Bennett Jensen said Friday that the decision was a "huge relief" for the youth involved.

"[The legislation] does not solve any real issues in the medical system," Jensen said in an interview.

"It simply creates them and targets an already very vulnerable, small group of young people with further discrimination, and that's what the judge found."

Premier Danielle Smith has said she believes the legislation is needed to protect young people from making permanent, life-altering decisions.

Smith has said it's about "upholding the rights of parents to care for, teach and protect their children."

Alberta Justice Minister Mickey Amery did not immediately provide comment on the decision.

Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said in a statement that his party was pleased to see the court decision, calling it a "great day for young Albertans who simply want to live authentically and safely."

"The court has determined what we already knew, that this ban could cause irreparable harm to gender diverse young Albertans," Nenshi said.

"This was never about doing the right thing: it was always about demonizing vulnerable kids to boost Danielle Smith's political fortunes."

Also lauding the decision Friday was Senator Kristopher Wells, the former Canada Research Chair for the Public Understanding of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.

"This isn't just a win for trans youth, it is a win for Canada's health-care system," Wells wrote on social media.

"No politician should be dictating or restricting your access to evidence-based medical care."

Egale and the Skipping Stone Foundation aren't the only groups challenging the bill.

Last month, the Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors launched a legal case challenging the constitutionality of the bill, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience.

Alberta's other two pieces of transgender legislation — banning transgender women from competing in women's sports and preventing youth under 16 from changing their name or pronouns in the school system without parental consent — have yet to be challenged in court.

The education bill also requires parents to opt in for their children to receive lessons in school on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity.

---

An Historic Win for Egale Canada and Skipping Stone in Alberta Regarding Bill 26 on Gender Affirming Care Access for Young People via Egale Canada

Today, on June 27, 2025, Egale Canada and Skipping Stone are thrilled to share that the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta has granted our injunction request to block the Government of Alberta’s denial of gender-affirming care for gender diverse young people in the province from coming into effect. This is an historic win, affirming that young people in Alberta and across Canada deserve to live authentically in safety and freedom.

On the basis of expert evidence, the Court concluded that Bill 26 would cause irreparable harm to gender diverse young people in Alberta. The Court recognized that, in addition to other harms, barring medical care for gender diverse young people would “reinforce the discrimination and prejudice that they are already subjected to”. The Court further concluded, “The evidence shows that there is a benefit to the public in issuing the injunction because it will allow this marginalized group to continue receiving medical care from trusted doctors and a broader team of health professionals thereby avoiding the adverse consequences the ban will have on them, including interference with their autonomy, unwanted and permanent development, serious stress and anxiety and further discrimination, until the issues are decided on a full record at trial. “

As we have long argued, the government should never interfere in the medical decisions of doctors and patients or prevent parents and youth from deciding what medical care is right for them. Everyone deserves the ability to access health care and participate fully in their communities. We are grateful that the Court has acted to protect access to critical medical care.

Comments

[minutia_r]

That's better than the alternative, but still...

Good luck.

[yuuago]

Thanks. <3